Should you read Popular Science? Really?

Given a chance recently to read Popular Science cover to cover, this becomes a really good question, for virtually everyone, not just early adopters, or technology types.  In my newly aware opinion, there are three strong reasons for reading Popular Science that apply to virtually everyone in leadership roles.  One gains:

  1. Information about personal health and handy breakthroughs that are real now
  2. Knowledge about business trends and discoveries that provide ideas for new business lines and services
  3. Everyone needs to network and a single issue provides months worth of discussion material

To illustrate these points, here are some highlights from the September 2015 edition.  Included:

  • How a robot will soon deliver things to your hotel room, then take a selfie with you
  • New IBM Chef Watson app that lets you pick several ingredients, then designs a creative menu for you
  • IWorkx leaf blower that is far more powerful, yet very light
  • Your history in a drop of blood — how Harvard has enabled the ability to discern your entire life history of viruses, so that you can figure out what vaccinations need boosting and better target how to attack other health issues
  • Uber Powerful — Their journey to creating driverless cars so that Uber is always cheaper than owning a car
  • Zip Line Designer — Chapter two for an airline pilot, who is using his navigational skills to design zip line courses that minimize the damage to forests
  • Do those guys with metal detectors ever find treasure?  Always wondered about that.
  • Will practicing a skill in your head make you better at it?

Popular Science, in the old fashioned print format, is very inexpensive.  Print is best way to read it, in my opinion, because you discover even more as you leaf through it.  Give it a shot.  I always have some around if you would like to give one a test drive.

– Jim Deupree

What is it really like to be on Shark Tank?

Is getting funded on Shark Tank an ultimate prize?  Not everyone likes the show, but I find it entertaining and actually good education for entrepreneurs.  Yet I have always wondered what really happens?

Last week I heard an amazing business growth story from Patrick Whaley, founder and CEO of TitinTech (www.titantech.com).  The story has two parts:  1) Incredible growth; and 2) The Shark Tank experience.  Incredible growth — from $100,000 monthly revenues to $1m monthly revenues in seven months.  How — Google and Facebook.  Their product is a very advanced weight garment used by amateur and professional athletes who wear it to train so that they feel lighter and faster when competing.  While they are now in Dick’s and other major retailers the driver continues to be on-line sales.  They are a model of the new marketing reality and an inspiration to anyone launching a new product without millions to spend on traditional advertising.

The incredible growth occurred before actually filming the Shark Tank episode, which takes about five hours.  His first ah-ha was that it is reality tv, and they are going to define you and make you the character they want.  In his case, Mark did not believe his growth, and Patrick was not allowed to bring financial on the set.  Patrick kept inviting Mark to go backstage to see for himself, but instead the back and forth lasted for two hours.  The in-person Patrick and the filmed Patrick seem like two different people. 

He did get funded but learned that the deal you end up with is not necessarily what you agreed to on the show.  Makes sense in some ways after additional due diligence.  The real issue is that one waits months to actually film the show, then several more months to close the deal, then more months to “activate” the deal.  Patrick’s product sells for several hundred dollars, and cash flow for manufacturing and inventory was his biggest need due to his explosive growth.  This became a key part of his deal, but it took seven months to place the first order after the deal was closed.

Time is money to any entrepreneur. Waiting first for the filming (they film each season across two weeks, not weekly as aired), then for the busy Sharks to focus on and close the deal, and finally to get the deal activated could mean missing a market. It is hard to imagine having a really hot product, then taking a year to fund enough product to meet demand.   Once in the Shark Tank web it is hard to get out — so one just has to ride it out.

In Patrick’s case, they were so impressed that they asked him to help mentor other companies which takes precious time.  Furthermore, he does not agree with all of the advice they offer his company.  So Patrick would say the reason to be on Shark Tank is to gain market exposure for your product — not the money. 

It was a great story, and he is an impressive young Georgia Tech alumni.  Go Patrick!

– Jim Deupree

What can we learn about career transition from NFL players?

Over the last ten years I have heard hundreds of career transition stories from senior executives. Some were voluntary, many were surprised and most would say “it came earlier than I expected or would have chosen”.

Whatever the trigger, it is natural to begin thinking “what could I have done differently?” “Am I as good as I thought I was?” Often the executive wants to share notes from colleagues about how much they will be missed, and those notes are sincere. Most of the executives were every bit as good as they thought. The trigger wasn’t them, it was changing organizational structure or needs of the bigger team.

The attached article about Reggie Wayne being released from the Indianapolis Colts is a great example and inspiration. As you read it you will appreciate that Reggie has done everything right. Clearly a Hall of Fame career on the field, and a stellar person and role model off the field. Yet he was cut — because the team, his team, needs to move on. Is there any more he could have done? Absolutely not. It is just the circle of jobs and life. He knew this day was coming someday, but was likely still not ready for it.

This wonderful story does raise two questions:

  1. What will they write about you someday?; and
  2. If you asked Reggie “what do you want to do next?” how do you think he would answer? And if his answer was “play another year” would you recommend for or against?

– Jim Deupree

—-

Article: Colts parting ways with longtime standout WR Reggie Wayne – Yahoo Sports

Insights from Lou Gerstner

I will always be a fan of Lou Gerstner for what he did for IBM, and our stock.  He truly saved the company, more than most realize.  Since leaving IBM, he has continued to lead a “portfolio” life in education, healthcare and private equity.  A recent interview published in the McKinsey & Company Quarterly (PDF / URL) shares his thoughts on the DNA of companies that keep on creating value.

One of those is his answer to “Is there something in the DNA of those firms that have endured?”  “Longevity is the capacity to change, not to stay with what you’ve got.”  He goes on to share that American Express resisted creating a credit card because they were afraid that it would impact their travelers check business, and IBM resisted other markets because mainframe computers were the major revenue source.  Where are travelers checks and mainframes today, and what would those companies be if they waited too long?  Perhaps like Kodak, which was afraid to impact their profitable film business despite owning all of the patents on digital cameras. 

After discussing the natural inertia against change, he says “Rather than changing, they find it easier to just keep on doing the same things that brought them success.  Remember that the enduring companies we see are not really companies that have lasted for 100 years.  They’ve changed 25 times or 5 times or 4 times over that 100 years, and they aren’t the same companies as they were.”

It is an insightful article, which you are encouraged to read.  But think about these points on a personal level as well.  As I talk with successful leaders about their own career inertia against change, the same things apply.  It is hard, and takes courage, to change what has worked.  Yet it is more apparent every day that twenty or more years of senior executive success does not guarantee another ten.  Failing to become proactive, and think in new paradigms, is a greater and greater risk.  And those who wait too long find their career in a turn-around situation — not because of any lack of ability, but because of market changes that were not anticipated far enough ahead.  Not many of you like turn-around situations, and certainly not for your own career.  The formula that creates sustainable companies also creates sustainable and satisfying careers.  Change ahead of the curve, before you are forced to!  Because if you lead the change, you have choice, about timing and the path you take. 

– Jim Deupree

64% of American Managers and Executives are not engaged in their job!

According to a Gallup Survey only 36% of Managers and Executives are engaged in their job.  51% are not engaged, and 13% are actively disengaged.  Wow!  

Workload and relatively flat earnings play a role.  Too many companies promote a view that everyone is replaceable.  But the survey found that the main driver was the boss.  “Managers from hell” are costing the US economy from $450 billion to $550 billion annually.

The survey also found that those who work off-site 20% of the time are more satisfied.  Why is that?  There are a number of surveys all confirming these findings.  We take two calls to action away from them:

  1. If you are not engaged, or actively disengaged, what are you going to do about it?
  2. If you are the boss, do you really know how your team feels about you and your leadership style?

Through our work we have met many executives who were desperately hanging onto a job they were not even sure they wanted.  Invariably their family feels it, and you can even see it in their faces.  So why do they stay?  One reason is that they do not know what else they would, or could, do.  Another is that “bird in hand is worth two in the bush.”  Neither are solving the core problem.  

Our society and workplace are evolving so fast that many new opportunities exist.  Talent and experience are more portable than ever before, as are ways to “get current” for different roles.  So, do you want to stay where you are as long as you can — or do you at least want to understand your options?  While you are pondering perhaps you will appreciate this poem:

If a man (or woman) does not keep pace with their companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer.

Let him (or her) step to the music they hear, however measured or far away.

Henry David Thoreau

Link to survey:  http://theweek.com/article/index/246084/why-most-americans-hate-their-jobs-or-are-just-checked-out

– Jim Deupree

What do you and a BMW have in common?

Some of you know that along with my love of cooking, wine and travel I am also a car guy.  My career began as an automotive engineer, and I appreciate the constant evolution of styling and engineering.

So I had to chuckle when reading a Car and Driver article about the 40th birthday of the BMW 3 Series.  It has won top car honors more than any other car, and built it’s reputation being agile, nimble and sporty.  Now, as they report: “The 3 series has put on weight over the years.  It’s gotten softer.  The creep of technology and features that have nothing to do with driving threatens to overwhelm the car, just as the pressures of family and finance leave us in a fog, wondering how, exactly, we arrived at this point in our lives.”

Too much introspection for a car magazine?  Perhaps.  Two things struck me.  One is the similarity between cars and us.  As we look in a mirror and reflect on our own lives, sometimes it feels like our best performance may have been in the rear view mirror.  That doesn’t mean that we will not continue to enjoy driving.  In fact, we are likely to set our GPS on new and exciting destinations.  And perhaps it becomes less about the speed, and more about the journey.

The big thing that struck me is what it means to have a legacy — to stand for something.  Legacies are built on past performance, not on future promises.  They symbolize having delivered, on what is important.  The BMW 3 – series may get softer and slower, but it will always be iconic — at least in our lifetime.  With everything else changing so rapidly it is nice to pause and realize that technology does not change legacies.  They are built brick by brick through consistent values and delivery.

What will your legacy be?  And when did you begin to build it?

– Jim Deupree

“Lean In” – The Real Story

Sheryl Sandberg has inspired a wave of confidence and aspiration among women with her “Lean In” book and foundation. What a wonderful thing! Yet perhaps lost in all of the publicity and enthusiasm is the role a pragmatic and unselfish partnership has played. Fortune magazine has her on the cover of their October 28 edition, with an article titled “Sheryl Sandberg: The Real Story”.

She is the COO of Facebook, not the CEO. That is normally an inward facing role, oriented to operations while the CEO gets all of the press. By all accounts she is a terrific operations executive and leader. The article relates one instance where a string of black limos signaled the arrival of yet another distinguished visitor. During their Friday afternoon Q&A with Mark Zuckerberg someone asked who? Mark replied “Oh, that was Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew. He came to see Sheryl”.

“While Zuckerberg is a celebrity in his own right — and the antihero of an Oscar-winning Hollywood film — Sandberg is not only the world’s most famous COO but also a rock star in business, politics, and popular culture, with unprecedented influence and reach.”

So how does that work? She is working for a much younger boss, and trumping him on visibility and influence. Where are the egos? I think that is an important part of the story. While most executives would let egos get in the way Zuckerberg finds it liberating for him. She does all the things he doesn’t really want to do so he can focus on product, engineering and retaining the core values of Facebook. Their trusting relationship has been great for Facebook, and for each other. Despite his relative youth he understands that “turning her loose” is a good thing on every measure. For her, and for Facebook. Congratulations to both!

As I think back I can name many situations where egos at the top collided, and would never have produced this result. The only one I can name that really worked for the individuals and the company was Roberto Goizeuta and Don Keough at The Coca-Cola Company. Yet there are so many instances where talents could have been meshed like this, with spectacular results. Hopefully her story will inspire more — in any combination of men and women.

– Jim Deupree

A Time to Do More of What I Want

I found a number of interesting points in this Yahoo! Finance article, written by a Gen X/Gen Y professional.

“I don’t consider a retirement as a time to do absolutely nothing; instead, I view it as a time when I can do more of what I want.”  What a great concept and perspective.  A time to do more of what I want — and therefore look forward to it!

“As someone who likes to stay busy, part-time work (or activities that will earn me some sort of income) will likely be part of my life until I die.  Therefore, I may be able to retire earlier than some, while still earning an income.  In the past, this may have been more of an all or nothing proposition, but with the ability to work through the internet and travel at the same time, it’s opening up a whole new retirement option … the working retirement.”   He nailed it!  When I talk with successful people, one of the things they want is a better balance of life — and getting away from being tied to a rigid schedule.  Advances in technology give us global freedom; and social acceptance of virtual meetings is here!  It is good for the ecology, and good for the people.

Trying new things.  The writer believes that “while stocks, bonds, pensions, and Social Security benefits can be strong elements of retirement finances, having something to hold onto and utilize as a way not only to possibly generate income … but to reduce expenses adds another integral part to how I hope to redefine our eventual retirement.”  

Some might call these “performing assets.”  His point is not about simply reducing expenses and living a more spartan lifestyle.  It is about deploying your assets in a way that cover some of your costs.  Many of you have a second home — which you rent some of the time to defray the costs.  Others are using new services like HomeAway to exchange use of their home (or second home) for a week or two with someone in Italy, or wherever.  Taking this to its limits means looking at deployment of your capital just as you would as a business.  What strategy gives you the greatest return — not just in income but bottom line?  Can you use some of your resources as a piece of the puzzle fueling your passions and contributing to your independence?

We are in an era, for many reasons, that provides an opportunity to think differently — and act on those thoughts. The questions continue to be how do you think differently, and when do you begin?  When you are ready to focus on those questions please give us a call — just to chat and share your thinking.

– Jim Deupree

What and how do you learn?

Last week I participated in a roundtable with 50 entrepreneur CEO’s, hosted by the Oxford Center.  We spent a fascinating 30 minutes discussing what they read and new ways of learning.

What do entrepreneurs read about? Is it their industry?  No — because most of them believe they are ahead of and setting new models for their industry.  Is it disruptive technologies?  Yes — because they want to be inspired by out-of-the box thinking.  Is it leadership approaches?  Yes — because they have not had corporate training on how to manage.  Is it compliance and governance?  No — partly because they don’t know what they don’t know, and partly because they tend to avoid businesses steeped in compliance.  Is it about cultures?  Yes — they are fascinated by better understanding cultures — and not just for business opportunity reasons.  Many of them are driven to succeed for what it will empower them to do to help others.

What about those who are not entrepreneurs?  Should they take a lesson from the entrepreneurs regarding what to read?  Perhaps!  Every company needs innovation and forward thinking, so why not emulate the entrepreneurs in looking for it?  And if you are not going to be doing the same thing forever, when do you begin reading about your own chapter two?

So, where do they read?  And this is not a tablet vs. hard copy question.  Harvard Business Review was given high marks for becoming very relevant again, along with Fast CompanyThe Sunday New York Times was mentioned, as were blogs brought to them via key word triggers.  Relevant books are still in vogue.

The conversation about how rapidly the world of higher education is changing was eye-opening.  Like many other parts of our culture, education is moving to just in time and new revenue sources.  One tipping point is that ROI on the cost of higher education has not met expectations the past few years — at the MBA and graduate level.  Another is the speed of business change and the specialization now desired.  Five years ago, Kennesaw State launched an innovative program customized to the needs of its corporate partners — even teaching a basket of selected MBA courses relevant to immediate challenges and needs on the company’s premises.

Now if you need to know more about a particular topic for a new initiative or opportunity  you can go to www.coursera.org, featuring courses led by top professors from Stanford and 62 other prestigious universities.  All of the courses are free, and you can participate from home or even on the beach.  Some are very technical, but some have broad business and personal appeal, including:

  • Critical thinking in global challenges — The University of Edinburgh
  • Surviving disruptive technologies – University of Maryland
  • Grow to Greatness: Smart Growth for Private Businesses – The University of Virginia
  • Inspiring Leadership Through Emotional Intelligence – Case Western Reserve University
  • Understanding Media by Understanding Google – Northwestern University

Perhaps you wonder, as I did, why such elite universities would participate and give away intellectual capital?  It appears that there are three reasons — revenue opportunity, global exposure on a massive scale, and benevolence.  To quote Vanderbilt University: “The exploration of digital learning is representative of two key aspects of our mission – creative experimentation of ideas and concepts and as a way to enhance our goal of dissemination of knowledge through teaching and outreach.

My conclusion is that what and how we learn is changing rapidly — in part because we have access to so much intriguing information and, in part, because more than ever we need to learn new things to stay relevant.

– Jim Deupree

Eight More Years!

One of the comments I hear most consistently from male prospects is “I want to work another 8 – 10 years”. What is driving that comment? Is it coming equally from men and women executives?

A friend of mine, with a great sense of humor, was about to get married and wanted to buy a home. The banker said “I understand you want a mortgage”. My friend replied NO! Only an idiot would want a mortgage. We want this house to become our home — and we understand that we need a mortgage to be able to buy it.

Men, early in the conversation, tell me how much longer they want to work. Continuing the analogy from the story above, does that mean they really want to work? No! Work is like the mortgage — it enables what they really want and need. Yes, they have more they want to accomplish and they want to give themselves enough time to accomplish it. Remaining relevant is very important, as is income. But at the top of the list is fear! Fear of “being done” and of the consequences triggered by true retirement. It is about relevance and health — regardless of age. We no longer think of retirement or even early retirement as enabling an enviable life of travel, golf and reading. Everyone seems to have a story about a family member or close friend who went downhill fast once they stopped working.

Women do not lead with how long they want to work — they talk most about wanting a better life. Their window is much shorter — typically 2-3 years and maybe even sooner. And they are bolder about just leaving, without something else lined up. They do not feel the same need to retain a title and business-centered role. They want to retain their independence, mentor other women and have more flexibility. Yet they are competitive,and need a new way to feel a sense of accomplishment beyond home and family.

Back to the men. Do the 8 – 10 year declarations seem to have some precision behind them? To be honest — not usually. Building savings is commonly a factor — yet very few know exactly how much additional savings they need or when they will be “done” on that measure. When I ask “how do you plan to accomplish working another 8-10 years?” the answers are usually pretty vague. Two conversations with Prospects last week illustrate the point. Both were senior executives, and both were caught by surprise in a massive downsizing resulting from a big change of strategy. One had moved his family twice in three years, and moving again is not an option — yet he was busy trying to save the company and did not have his own plan. The other said: “I had a plan. I was going to finish up the integration I was leading, then in two-three years think about what I wanted to do next.” My response was: “you had a vision, not a plan”.

So what do men and women have in common? Confusing aspirations and hope with a plan. A plan for having the next steps laid out — and being ready to launch those steps when needed.

I have observed how much peace our Clients and their families have once establishing such a plan, and I have witnessed too many regrets for not having one when “stuff happens”. Regardless of how well-placed someone is, or how highly regarded the individual may be within their organization, more and more factors are interrupting well-thought aspirations beyond their control. The reasons driving the desire to continue working are deep and important on many levels — identity, sense of accomplishment, legacy, family. These reasons are only filled from meaningful roles that feed the persons needs — not from just any job. You can leave it to chance, knowing that route has become more brutal even for successful executives, or have a plan!

– Jim Deupree